|
Star
letter Star
letter Star
letter Star
letter Star
letter
|
|
COLOURING
THE WALKWAY
Chosen as a
runner-up in the Garden Ideas/ Cuprinol competition I received coupons
for Cuprinol Garden Shades. After much thought on what to use them
on I decided to brighten up the fence that runs along the side passageway.
I opted for
the shade ‘Willow’ and painted the whole fence this colour and stencilled
on leaves and flowers in a darker shade of green and blue. The end
result is a brighter and far more interesting passage. Thank you.
Barbara Tomlinson, Lancashire
|
 |
|

|
A
DIMMOCK TOO FAR
Unlike C Robertson
(Your news and views, March), I found the programme Flying Gardeners
with Charlie Dimmock, tiresome.
Just how many
programmes and products can one woman publicise. I think the Dimmock
craze has gone far too far.
Gardening personalities
have worked hard for many years to put gardening where it is today
– in line with home diy, yet to me it seems that Charlie Dimmock
is receiving all the credit for what has been many years and many
people’s hard work.
Please, let
us see someone else on the tv!
J
Sommerville, London
|
|
NETTLE
RELIEF
Your feature
on herbs in February has prompted me to tell you about one of my
own tips.
In my garden’s
‘wild patch’ I tolerate nettles for the sake of wildlife and at
least one broad-leaved dock plant for my own sake. The reason being
that when rubbed onto nettle-stung skin, the sap of the dock provides
an instantly effective balm.
M McAllister, Co Durham
|
‘Value
for money may mean paying more, but it does mean that you receive
added benefits’ |
|
THE
OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN
As a garden
centre (Ullesthorpe Garden & Aquatic Centre) which has just begun
to sell Garden Ideas, I would like to congratulate you on
the magazine. At last it appears there is somebody who is willing
to portray garden centres as someone other than ‘the enemy’ to gardeners.
Your article
on whether garden centres are a rip off or not (January 2000, ‘Are
you being ripped off’), encouraged me to contact you. After reading
it, I am still concerned that (through no fault of your own) many
garden centres still have to contend with the public’s perception
of them as ‘daylight robbers’. This may be true of some but not
all.
|
 |
|
I was very
surprised that your shoppers chose centres that, without prejudice,
are not considered major players in the trade. Not one garden centre
chain was included, nor was any of a huge number of larger independents.
Although I
am not inferring any of the centres featured are below par, the
average price on many of the products featured was cheap compared
with these larger centres or chains.
As your article
showed, there has to be a distinction between ‘cheap’ and ‘value
for money’. Very few of the best centres in the country have got
where they are today by adopting the former strategy. Value for
money may well mean paying more, but it does mean that you receive
added benefits
Ian Colledge, Ullesthorpe Garden & Aquatic Centre, Leicestershire
|
|

|
NEW
BEGINNINGS
Having had
my garden taken over by four leylandii trees, your article
in the March issue ‘Garden Ideas goes shopping for hedging
inspiration’ gave me renewed heart.
I have been
unsure of what to do with these towering monsters, as chopping them
down would expose a row of unsightly garages, but leaving them has
meant depletion of the nutrients in the soil. Now, however, I can
hardly wait to chop them back and wait for the new growth.
M Sorrell, Hampshire
|
|